A youth group within the Labour Party(LP) in Edo State under the umbrella of ‘Shine Your Eyes Group’, (SYEG), has on Tuesday commended the Independent National Electoral Commission(INEC) and Professor Mahmood Yakubu, its National Chairman, for adhering strictly to the rule of law in deepening democracy through Edo State LP’s candidates list ahead of the September governorship election.
The statement by SYEG came in reaction to an earlier statement by the Edo State Chairman of LP, Kelly Ogbaloi, who faulted INEC’s listing of Oluyinka Faith Alufohai as the deputy governorship candidate of the party.
The group in a statement signed by its Chairman, Comrade Jonah Ifada and Secretary, Osagie Omoregie also knocked Kelly Ogbaloi over his rejection of INEC final list and reminded the party that what the electoral body has done was in accordance to the law and deserves commendation.
They also noted that what has become the lot and tragedy for the LP in Edo State was a clear reflection of the shambolic primary it conducted in the State where the wishes of the party’s faithful was subverted by those entrusted to run the affairs of the party.
Ifada noted, “Our attention has been drawn to the ranting by the Edo State Chairman of the Labour Party, Kelly Ogbaloi, rejecting the nomination of Oluyinka Faith Alufohai in INEC announced final list of candidates as ludicrous.
“We want to state equivocally and remind Ogbaloi that INEC is not like the LP and that what INEC has done was in line with the rule of law and deserves commendation for being vigilant and thorough.
“We had warned the LP to play by the rules of the game but they choose to bow to the weight of naira and dollars to subvert democracy and the wishes of our people.
“As stakeholders, we are however confident that the abnormality by the party would be corrected by the court as we have it on good authority that one of the aspirants, Barrister Kenneth Imansuangbon, has gone to court to seek interpretation of the constitution as regards issues in the party’s primary.”
Recall that Imansuangbon in his petition stated that Barrister Olumide Akpata committed a horde of offences ranging from giving false information to the acquisition of citizenship of another country, which is a grand departure from the Nigerian Constitution’s accepted norms.
On the allegation of false information, Barrister Imansuangbon alleged that Barrister Akpata while filling INEC form EC 9 “stated his name to be Akpata Olumide Anthony which is different from and not the same as Akpata Olumide Osaigbovo which he earlier stated on oath to be his name and under which he contested and reportedly won the primary election of the LP.
Imansuangbon wanted the court to determine whether Akpata “has not supplied or otherwise given false information to the INEC within the meaning or contemplation of the provisions of section 29(5) of the Electoral Act 2022 read together with section 182(1) (a) and (j) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).”
On Akpata taking an oath of allegiance of Vanuatu, an independent and sovereign nation, Imansuangbon wanted clear interpretation of the Nigerian constitution to know if Akpata’s “claim on oath, in the said INEC form EC 9 that he has not voluntarily acquired the citizenship of another country is not or does not amount to false information, within the meaning of the provisions of section 29(5) of the Electoral Act, 2022, read together with section 182(1) (a) and (j) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria(as amended).”
On Oluyinka Faith Alufokhai, “who is parading herself” as the running mate of Barrister Akpata, the petitioner cited some information that she supplied in INEC form EC 9 which do not add up. The information includes that “she was born in 1981 and that she obtained her First School Leaving Certificate in the same year of her birth.
“Her name is Alufokhai Oluyinka Faith while her former name was Ikheafe and she obtained three certificates namely OND, HND and PGD the same year, 2005.”
Discussion about this post